Classification of Workers :: Classification Essays

Money is the foremost incentive why infinite people work around the world. There are unequal classifications of jobs that contain more physical labor or deskwork. Some work as rescuers, businessmen, consultants, a student, doctors, or even garbage men. No matter where an individual works, they will always encounter three types of workers: Hard-Workers, Slackers, and Mediocres. The Hardworking people have several superb characteristics. These types of people usually goes to work on time or maybe even five or ten minutes early to see what needs to be accomplished. During the day, it rarely happens that they have to be advised to do something twice. When they clean rooms or set-up computers, they do it to the best of their ability and recheck everything to make certain it’s working properly. In addition, they tend to get things done on time and not one second late. Overall, Hardworking people are very responsible and reliable in a working environment. Slackers are much different than Hardworking people. They come to work five to ten minutes late without an excuse. They tend to work hard for the first three or four weeks of the job, but once they observe how the system works, their useless. Slackers hardly work from the time scheduled to the time finished. In addition, they do more viewing and squatting, then moving around and assisting others with equipment. They have to be informed when, where, and why they have to do it. The quality of the job is usually sloppy and doesn’t get accomplished on time. Lastly, their very unreliable people that don’t care about work, but need the money. Lastly, a Mediocre person has several characteristics as slackers, but somewhat better and more useful. Mediocre people on occasion cruise to work early or late, depends on how well their day went. Mediocre people can be Hardworker’s or Slacker’s depending on whether or not the boss is there. On occasion, they have to be told twice when to do something because they’re sometimes irresponsible. They work when they want and when they don’t, they won’t. They know when to stop Slacking and start working. They only do work that need to get accomplish. If they don’t have to do it, then they will lay it off for another person. The quality of work depends upon their mood and whom they associate with. Lastly, Mediocre people can be either reliable or unreliable/ It would be difficult trying to locate many hard working people around the world.

Investing in Education Is the Most Effective Way to Reduce Poverty Essay

â€Å"Investing in education is the most effective way to reduce poverty† In many ways this is a difficult statement to assess. There is no doubt that education is a key initiative in the reduction of poverty. Whether it is the most effective is harder to say for sure. We can easily confirm correlation in the relationship between reduced poverty and increases in factors such as education and health. However it is no simple task to measure and compare the level of impact a component such as education has on poverty. There are many factors and variables that influence the poverty of a country and many of these factors influence one another, strengthening or weakening their individual effects and implications. However after researching the topic I feel I agree with the statement. Before I continue to argue my stance on the title statement I will discuss the basic problem of poverty and the accepted policies and solutions. Poverty is arguably the greatest obstacle facing developing countries in the world today. Poverty can be defined in two ways; absolute poverty and relative poverty. The absolute poverty of a country relates to the number of people who have a standard of living below a certain level. In essence it is a person’s inability to command sufficient resources to satisfy basic human needs. This quantity of resources is called the poverty line. Relative poverty on the other hand refers to the income share of the poorest section of society (Tara Mitchell, 2012). Absolute poverty can be abolished by directly raising the living standards of everyone in a country above the established level – poverty line. Relative poverty however can only be combatted by reducing the gap between the rich and the poor so that the poorest section of a society receives an acceptable percentage of the total income. In other words inequality is the obstacle to overcome. Growth is the key initiative in ending absolute poverty in developing countries. Aid can be supplied to help boost living standards temporarily but growth and development allow countries to support themselves. Growth has a positive correlation with reduction of absolute poverty. Investment in areas such as education, health and gender equality induce growth within early stage developing countries (World Health Organisation, 2008). It is not as clear with relative poverty as it is a share of total income received by the poorest section of society. It can only be reduced not eradicated, by lowering inequality. However many experts differ in opinion on whether reducing inequality has a positive effect on growth. There are two main types of inequality. The first, structural, which relates to historical factors of social divide and infrastructure is definitely bad for growth, as it confines people to predetermined sectors with no drive to innovate. The other type, Market inequality has a much more ambiguous relationship with growth. Some argue that inequality is necessary for growth as there are incentivises people to achieve more. In terms of the most extreme poverty and basic growth, the reduction of inequality seems to be a positive approach (M. Ravallion, 2005) Health and education are important objectives and components of growth and development. For developing countries these two objectives are pivotal in the early eradication of poverty. There is a positive correlation between the number of years of schooling and both income and growth (Cohen & Soto, 2007). In terms of health (which is usually measured in life expectancy at birth or daily per-capita calories) there is also a positive correlation with increases in income (Heston, summers & Aten, 2006). This increased income and/or growth would be seen as direct reduction in poverty. It is difficult to determine whether health or education has a stronger effect on income. This is because they are both heavily intertwined and overlap in many regards. It is found that increased investment in health boosts education and vice versa (Bloom, 2007). In Miguel and Kremer’s 2004 paper they examine the effect of de-worming programs on Kenyan primary school kids. The investigation, which randomized more than 75 schools, shows that the de-worming lowered absenteeism from school by one-quarter in the treatment group and also improved health and school participation in students who were not included in the program (Miguel & Kremer, 2004). In 2005 at the UN’s World Summit, the international community pledged half the number of people living in extreme poverty by 2015 outlining the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). These are a series of eight dead lined targets, most of which aim to eradicate the root causes of poverty worldwide. These goals highlight the main forms in which poverty appears hunger, education, inequality and various health related problems. These are therefore the main areas that investment is made to reduce poverty (UNFPA, 2005). The eight MDG’s are: eradicating extreme poverty and hunger, Achieving universal primary education, promoting gender equality and empowering women, reducing child mortality rates, improving maternal health, combating HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases, ensuring environmental sustainability, and developing a global partnership for development. Looking at these MDG’s, which area of investment would be most effective in reducing poverty? You can see from the above goals that health is a dominant issue, as many of the goals can be attributed to health deficiency problems. It is also true that hunger is maybe the most important and fundamental form of poverty and so must be invested in foremost. Strong investment in improved agriculture practices and technology can stabilise extreme hunger and famine. Gender equality is vital for general welfare of all people but it also gives women an equal control within marriages and families helping to reduce birth rates and HIV levels. When women can negotiate their reproductive health decisions with men, this gives them greater rights and increased decision-making in families and communities that benefits all. This enables people to have fewer children and helps to stimulate development. The average per-capita income increases, as families are smaller and income is shared. Also countries with the most rapid increases in population and the high fertility levels generally have the highest poverty levels (UNFPA, 2005). In my opinion education is the most effective investment. As well as being a major component of growth and development it also provides a foundation for all the other battles against poverty. Health and education are invariably interconnected. Educating and informing people to learn about and maintain their own health is as important as the medicine and infrastructure provided. It also provides an educated population to provide future health resources. Education also gives sustainability to policies aimed at eradicating hunger and starvation e.g. modern agricultural methods. A well founded education system is a platform to give men and women the knowledge and information needed to combat overpopulation and the spread of crippling diseases such as HIV/AIDS. In any form method of fighting poverty the quality is just as important as quantity. There is little point in continued investment in these areas if there are not efforts made to remove and improve on the current inefficiencies. With both education and health many problems have arisen from poor implementation of programs. The lack of fine and accurate systems has seen a lot of invested resources squandered. Absenteeism has been the plight of both health and education efforts in developing countries consistently worldwide. In Uganda 27% of teachers were found to be absent on a daily basis. Likewise, in Indonesia, 40% absenteeism in primary health clinics was occurring daily (Pratham, 2006). Furthermore, even teachers who attend may not actually be in class; in India, only two-thirds of teachers present in school were actually teaching (Kremer et al, 2004). So what is going wrong? Firstly, there doesn’t seem to be any strong repercussions for teachers with poor attendance. In a survey of 3000 Indian government schools astonishingly only one school reported firing a teacher for poor attendance (Pratham, 2006). There are certainly systems in place whereby theoretically, supervisors record absences and deal out punishments accordingly. Some even implemented this on an incentivised reward and punishment basis. However most studies reflect that schemes implemented with a supervisor making judgements at his/her own discretion, do not work. This may seem like a more feasible system, allowing a human element to determine the severity or genuine nature of the reasons for absent teachers. But absences in local communities responsible for self-monitoring and accountability were simply not reported (Pratham, 2006). It is evident that institutions providing public services are very complex and focusing on the details counts. Governments and organisations involved in these areas have to continuously adapt and innovate the systems to fit there region, country and people. There are systems that do appear to be working. They are most notably impersonally monitored and accounted. One study in Rajastan, India where machines were used to check teachers in and provided an incentivised pay system based on attendance with external monitoring. This cut the growing problem with attendance in half (Seva Mandir, NGO). Surprisingly some of the most successful systems are not teacher incentivised. For example a girl’s scholarship program run in Kenya offered scholarships based on high test scores. The result showed a large academic improvement throughout the age group, even boys not included in the scholarship improved their marks dramatically. There was also a significant rise in attendance of teachers, though causality cannot be guaranteed, this is presumably due to increased student motivation to learn (Kremer, Miguel, & Thornton, 2007) Often the most absentee reducing methods are found to be the most cost effective also. What is for certain is that supervisors cannot be allowed discretion to determine rewards. The system must be impersonal. Successful application of such systems can be found in Brazil and Mexico. In Brazil it is known as conditional cash transfer (CCT), this idea was based on Mexico’s original Progressa system. It provides financial support to families for food, school and medical expenses and is weighted dependant on the attendance level (Economist, 2005). Another system known as â€Å"local accountability with teeth†, where locals have the authority to hire and fire themselves has also a lot of potential and most importantly it reduces cost of financial incentive (MIT, 2010). This problem has been subject to great debate and investigation amid governments and agencies involved with the reduction of poverty in the developing world. It is widely acknowledged that improvements in the absentee rate in both schools and health care centres would lead to better living standards in struggling countries. A 2008 study showed that when teacher attendance rose from 58-79% this coincided with a 7% point increase in the number of girls able to write (Duflo, Hanna & Ryan, 2008). However it is not as clear if amendments to absentee levels in healthcare lead to more patients attending clinics (Bjorkman & Svensson, 2007). According to a similar surprise survey visit to schools and healthcare centres on India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Uganda, Ecuador and Peru checking up on attendance changes and their affects, the results showed a doubling of the country’s GDP resulted in an 8% pt. decline in education absences and only a 3.8% pt. fall in healthcare absences(Chauhury et al, 2006). This shows that whilst health and education both have positive responses to improved attendances, education changes have a stronger positive relationship with GDP (Income) than the health attendance changes. Having read and studied a number of papers and articles on the issue, I am of the opinion that investment in education is the most effective way to reduce poverty. Whilst health issues dominate the main forms that poverty appears in, I feel that a sustainable and affective health system can only be established after there is a strong foundation of education already in place. The same can be said for all problems associated with poverty and so the returns on education investment are wide reaching and long lasting. Education also has a more effective response to investment and absentee improvements than health. It is the basis for a countries future stability; every developed country in today’s world has a strong education system right up to 3rd level. It is crucial investment needed by developing countries to have and advance basic education services to help build all facets of a countries growth. With a more educated population the problems at the roots of poverty can be tackled. Starvation, disease, gender equality, income and the overall quality of life can improve and be maintained without external aid. This is why I think the statement is correct that investing in education is the most effective way to reduce poverty. Bibliography: * Lecture slides EC3040A, Tara Mitchell, 2012 * Human Rights, Health & Poverty Reduction Strategies, World Health Organisation; 2008 * Reducing Poverty and achieving Sustainable Development, United Nations Population Fund, 2005 * Growth and human capital: good data, good results, D.Cohen & M. Soto; 2007 * Penn World Table, version 6.2, Centre for International Comparisons of Production, Income & Price; A. Heston, R. Summers, & B. Aten, 2006 * Inequality is bad for the poor, M. Ravallion, World Bank, 2005 * Education, Health and Development, D. Bloom; 2007 * Fighting Poverty: What Works? Pratham; 2006 * Missing in action: Teacher and Health work absence in developing countries, N. Chaudhury, J. Hammer, M. Kremer, K. Muralidharam & F. Halsey Rogers; 2006 * Power of the people: Evidence from a randomized field experiment of a community based monitoring project in Uganda, M. Bjorkman & J. Svensson; 2007 * Incentives to Learn, M. Kremer, E. Miguel, R. Thornton; 2007 * New thinking about an old problem, The Economist; 2005 * Poverty Action Lab, Abdul Latif Jameel, MIT; 2010

Renewable Energy And Natural Gas - 1123 Words

Finally, the last form of power generation to be examined before the moral analysis is renewable energy, for example wind and solar power. Renewable energy is the least established method of generating electricity and is therefore still heavily tied up in research. By definition, renewable energy sources have a theoretically limitless amount of energy production since they do not deplete any resources through their use. This means that for as many years as humans inhabit the earth they can use renewable energies, such as solar, wind, hydro-power or others, which has much more potential than the 100 years for coal and natural gas. Renewable energy also has fewer negative environmental impacts since it does not directly release any†¦show more content†¦One utilitarian approach used to determine which act is most ethical, is cost-benefit analysis. This analysis compares the potential benefits against the costs (financial, physical risks etc.) of possible decisions. For choosing which energy source the public should invest money in and engineers should invest research in, the criterion detailed above are compared. For cost-benefit analysis, shown in Table 1, the effect on future generations is incorporated at the same value as the effect on current generations. For the cost criterion, renewable energy is currently the least beneficial in regards to price to the public, cost of updating current technologies, researching new technologies, and implementing new infrastructure. Natural gas has lower costs related to infrastructure and technology changes than renewable energy, but when compared to coal, it has higher public cost as well as higher implementation costs. Consequently, for the greatest amount of happiness for people, which is related to lower costs, coal is the best energy source. Furthermore, natural gas has a much higher efficiency than renewables and coal, which have similar efficiencies. Human fulfilment, coming from happiness in the utilitaria n theory, relates to the best/most effective use of resources, i.e. people do not like to waste time or money. Therefore, natural gas, withShow MoreRelatedRenewable Forms Of Energy And Natural Gas1131 Words   |  5 PagesMichigan in the upper Midwest of the United States currently relies heavily on nonrenewable energy sources including fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. As we striveto reduce the negative impacts from the use of nonrenewable resources and from our growing population, local and state governments are exploring new, renewable forms of energy, as well ashow to increase demand through conservation. Not all energy alternatives are suited for all locations, so the advantages and disadvantages of currentRead MoreSample Resume : Renewable A ,Äà ©1682 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"RENEWABLE A‎N‎D N‎O‎N-RENEWABLE RESO‎URC‎E‎S† D‎I‎GITA‎L A‎S‎SIGNMENT -1 S‎ub‎mitt‎ed f‎or t‎he co‎u‎rs‎e: En‎gin‎eeri‎ng Ch‎e‎mi‎stry (C‎H‎Y1002) B‎y Sri‎k‎a‎r K‎a‎livarapu 1‎6B‎IT0078 V‎IT UNIVERSIT‎Y, Vel‎lore N‎a‎me of facu‎l‎t‎y: M‎r‎s BA‎RN‎A‎LI MA‎I‎T‎I (S‎C‎H‎OOL O‎F A‎DVANC‎E‎D S‎CI‎ENCE‎S) A‎ug‎ust, 2016 1) Wh‎at i‎s Energy? 2) T‎y‎pe‎s of Energy Sources i) Non-Renewable Sources of Energy ii) Renewable Sources of Energy 3) Non-Renewable Sources of Energy i) Cr‎u‎d‎e o‎i‎lRead MoreRenewable Energy Sources For Fossil Fuels1240 Words   |  5 Pagesin order to provide us energy. Almost everything we use nowadays consumes power in some form, and in tandem we rely on energy. Fossil fuels have become the go to resource for providing power. Fossil fuels include natural resources such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas. These fossil fuels fall under the non-renewable category because they take thousands of years in order to form naturally and cannot be replaced as fast as they are being consumed. Another non-renewable energy source is nuclear fuelRead MoreFossil Fuels ( Oil, Coal, Natural Gas )1743 Words   |  7 PagesFossil Fuels (Oil, Coal, Natural Gas) Debbie Burrell SCI2000 Gwynedd Mercy University Abstract Fossil fuels are non-renewable sources of energy that were form billions of years ago. The three different types of fossil fuels in the world include: oil, coal and natural gas. Although each of the three types of fossil fuels are extracted differently they are all processed and used as the world’s primary sources of energy. Being the world’s primary sources of energy, fossil fuel experience advantagesRead MoreEnergy Resources And Renewable Energy1240 Words   |  5 PagesEveryone uses a lot of power for lighting, heating, machines, movements, and so much more. All of that energy has to come from an energy supply. Some energy resources are renewable, while others are non-renewable. Energy has various forms and is a very essential part of our everyday lives. In my house, I always try to conserve energy when I can. I try an hot water by using a lower flow shower head and very rarely use the bath tub which does waste a lot of hot water. When buying light bulbs, I onlyRead MoreHow Power Relations Influence The Growth Of The Renewable Energy Industry1513 Words   |  7 Pagesthe growth of the renewable energy industry. Student Name : Student Number : â€Æ' Executive Summary This concise report summarizes the present analysis and important issues and provides better recommendation. In this report I have discussed the short and long term benefits and risks for the renewable energy industry. I have considered public education that allows noise levels and visual amenity to encourage establishment wind farms and other sources of renewable energy. And also a nationalRead MoreCanada s Energy Policy Should Be Beneficial1109 Words   |  5 Pagesbiggest energy producer in the world. Currently Canada is ranked 5th in regards to its production of energy in the world. Canada’s energy policy, should revolve around the natural resources and their optimum use to produce cheap and clean energy, which should be environmental friendly. Our policy should be beneficial for all the Canadians living in different parts of the country and that the policy should not discriminate among the provinces. Canada is also the biggest consumer of the energy in theRead MoreRenew able Energy : An Source Of Stable And Resilient Energy Provider1169 Words   |  5 PagesThere are few criteria that must be met in order for energy to be called â€Å"renewable†, first the sources cannot be finite, second the sources must be carbon neutral, and lastly it must not pollute the environment. Most of the renewable energy either comes directly or indirectly from the sun and the other lone source is from the earth. The example of an indirect source from the sun can be wind, tidal waves, and bioenergy. After being aware of the bounds of the fossil fuel, more countries around theRead MoreEssay Impacts Of An Energy Plan945 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿ Impacts of an Energy Plan Juanita Stanberry SCI/275 Suzette Mackenzie March 26, 2015 My dearest great-great grand-children: The finding of this letter explaining the best option for a long-term energy sustainability plan is no accident, and if you have opened a time capsule as directed, this letter is one hundred years old and the year is two thousand and fifteen (2015). The nation’s current energy situation is in bad shape. We have nearly depleted the planets resources of fossil fuels thatRead MoreDepletion of Non Renewable Resources of Energy1422 Words   |  6 PagesA  non-renewable resource  is a  natural resource  which cannot be produced, grown, generated, or used on a scale which can  sustain  its consumption rate, once depleted there is no more available for future needs. Also considered non-renewable are resources that are consumed much faster than nature can create them.  Fossil fuels  (such as  coal,  petroleum, and  natural gas), types of nuclear power (uranium) and certain  aquifers  are examples. Natural resources such as  coal,  petroleum,  oil  and  natural gas  take